13.6 C
New York
Friday, November 8, 2024
HomeNewsSolicitor struck off roll for breach of code of conduct

Solicitor struck off roll for breach of code of conduct

Date:

Related stories

Elon Musk’s transgender daughter Vivian Jenna Wilson plans to leave US following Trump’s victory

Since 2022, Vivian Jenna Wilson, Elon Musk’s estranged transgender...

Indian-American community supports Trump’s leadership and policies after historic election victory

Members of the Indian-American community welcomed Donald Trump’s victory...

Health concerns rise for astronaut Sunita Williams amid extended space mission

NASA astronaut Sunita Williams, currently aboard the International Space...

Indian-American business icons rally behind Trump’s victory, pledge stronger US-India ties

Following Donald Trump’s recent victory, key Indian-American leaders and...

A SOLICITOR found guilty of misrepresentation of facts and breaching code of conduct has been struck off the roll.

Neelash Mehta was found driving a vehicle while being disqualified from doing so following his conviction for drunk driving. Later he was found to have concealed his conviction while entering into a contract with a firm.

In 2016, he drove a vehicle after consuming alcohol beyond the permissible limit and was barred from driving for a year.

Mehta repeated the office two years later and was disqualified again – this time for 40 months.

On at least four occasions between October 2018 and September 2019, he drove his vehicle while being disqualified from driving, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal heard.

- Advertisement -

During his second disqualification period, he declared twice to his employer Ashfords that he had a valid driving licence to make expenses claims of a total of £63.9. His defence was that his wife was driving the vehicle at the time.

When his company Kaelaar Limited entered into a contract for services with remote working firm Keystone in 2020, he misrepresented that he had not been convicted of a criminal offence and that he had not been subject to any disciplinary procedures or investigation by any former firm or employer.

The tribunal rejected his argument that he had signed the contract without fully reading it.

Mehta “wished to maintain his reputation and income at Ashfords and did not want to jeopardise his ability to continue to earn money with Keystones”, the tribunal said.

“He knew when he signed the expenses forms that the declarations he made were untrue. He also knew, having read the contract, that the warranties that he gave to Keystones were also untrue,” it said.

Mehta, who has about 20 years of experience in the legal profession, has also been ordered to pay £27,000 in costs.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories