10.5 C
New York
Tuesday, March 4, 2025
HomeEntertainmentSC to hear plea of Rajasthan, MP against release of Padmaavat

SC to hear plea of Rajasthan, MP against release of Padmaavat

Date:

Related stories

Tensions rise between Kanye West and Bianca Censori amid controversies

Kanye West & Bianca Censori: Rising Tensions Amid Ongoing...

Deepika Padukone shines in Cartier’s 63.76-carat necklace at Dubai event

Deepika Padukone Stuns in Cartier’s Chryseis Necklace at Dubai...

Ed Sheeran enjoys traditional ‘champi’ in Chennai before concert, internet reacts

Ed Sheeran's Indian Head Massage Goes Viral During Mathematics...

Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh today moved the Supreme Court seeking recall of its January 18 order by which controversial Bollywood movie “Padmaavat’ was allowed to be released in theatres across India on January 25.
A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud agreed to hear tomorrow the interim applications of both the states seeking modification of the apex court order allowing exhibition of the movie.
The states claimed that section 6 of the Cinematograph Act empowers them to stop exhibition of any controversial movie on the grounds of possible violation of law and order.
Senior advocate Harish Salve, appearing for Viacom 18 the producers of the Deepika Padukone-starrer, opposed urgent hearing on any such interim applications.
The court, however, agreed to hear the applications tomorrow.
The Supreme Court had on January 25 paved the way for the nationwide release of ‘Padmaavat’ by staying the ban on its screening in Gujarat and Rajasthan.
The apex court also restrained other states from issuing any such notification or order banning the screening of the movie.
The film, starring Deepika Padukone, Shahid Kapoor and Ranveer Singh in lead roles, is based on the saga of historic battle of 13th century between Maharaja Ratan Singh and his army of Mewar and Sultan Alauddin Khilji of Delhi.
Haryana and Madhya Pradesh governments have not issued any formal order but had stated that they would not allow the exhibition of the film.
Maintaining that states were under constitutional obligation to maintain law and order, the apex court had said that this duty also includes providing police protection to persons who are involved in the film, its exhibition and the audience watching it.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here