8.4 C
New York
Sunday, December 29, 2024
HomeNewsPakistan to probe spy agency’s ‘intimidation’ of judges on political cases

Pakistan to probe spy agency’s ‘intimidation’ of judges on political cases

Date:

Related stories

Trump reconsiders TikTok ban ahead of Supreme Court decision

US President-elect Donald Trump filed a brief Friday (27)...

‘Crocodile Dundee’ star Burt dies peacefully at Crocosaurus Cove

The saltwater crocodile Burt, famed for his role in...

Biden administration modernizes H-1B visa rules to boost US business Competitiveness

The Biden administration has introduced changes to H-1B visa...

Zakir Hussain, legendary tabla maestro, dies at 73

Tabla legend Zakir Hussain has passed away at the...

PAKISTAN will set up an inquiry commission to investigate accusations by six High Court judges of interference and intimidation by the country’s powerful intelligence agencies in judicial decisions, the law minister said last Thursday (28).

Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar made the announcement at a news conference in Islamabad, saying the decision was taken at a meeting between prime minister Shehbaz Sharif and the chief justice of Pakistan, Qazi Faez Isa.

Their meeting took place after a letter written by six judges of the Islamabad High Court was sent to Isa’s office. It alleged that the country’s top spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), had been intimidating them to seek favourable decisions in political cases.

The Pakistani army’s media office did not respond to a Reuters’ request for a comment.

“We believe it is imperative to inquire into and determine whether there exists a continuing policy on part of the executive branch of the state, implemented by intelligence operatives who report to the executive branch, to intimidate judges, under threat of coercion or blackmail, to engineer judicial outcomes in politically consequential matters,” said the letter, addressed to the Supreme Judicial Council headed by Justice Isa and seen by Reuters.

- Advertisement -

It mentioned as an example that the ISI’s operatives intimidated through “friends and relatives” two of the judges who had declared against taking up a political case related to jailed former prime minister Imran Khan last year.

One of the allegations in the letter was that in March 2023, “considerable pressure was brought to bear” on judges “by operatives of the ISI” over a case facing Khan.

“Fearing for their security, they sought additional protection for their homes,” the letter said.

It also alleges a judge’s brother-in-law was abducted by “individuals who claimed to be operatives of the ISI” and “tortured into making false allegations”.

LEAD Pakistan judges INSET Nawaz Sharif GettyImages 2065521042
Nawaz Sharif

On another occasion, a judge was said to have found secret cameras in his lounge and bedroom.

It said the six judges had brought such cases in their chief’s knowledge and also met the then chief justice of Pakistan to “share their concerns regarding efforts of ISI operatives to affect judicial outcomes”.

They said the interference continued despite their chief assuring them that he had taken up the matter with the ISI head, who gave his word that there would not be any such interference, the judges’ letter said.

An official at Islamabad High Court who asked to remain anonymous confirmed to AFP that the letter was delivered to the Supreme Judicial Council, which oversees the courts.

Khan’s main opponent, the prime minister’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), had also accused the ISI of intimidating the same court’s decisions which led to convictions of his elder brother Nawaz Sharif after his ouster from the prime minister’s office in 2017.

The powerful army plays an oversized role in making and breaking governments in Pakistan.

Khan and elder Sharif both have alleged that they were ousted by the military after they fell out with the generals.

“We want it to be thoroughly probed because we had also been its victim,” Tarar said.

A statement released on Khan’s X account said: “the fact that the judges have been intimidated and coerced into giving judgments based on political expediency raises a lot of questions on the fairness of the courts and their judgments over the last two years”. (Reuters, AFP)

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories